http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1248277865693&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
Just as I suspected, he was wrong. Obama is trying to tell the Jews they can't live wherever in Jerusalem. He is trying to halt building on land purchased from the Arabs to a Jew over a century ago. You see who's side he's on... Yeah, we know who's side he's on.
Incidentally, a muslim tried to run me over this morning while I was on my way to work. Uh, huh! You see how they are? That's how they are.
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Obama making nice with the Muslims
Well, it was all over the goyisha free paper today that Obama is trying to make nice with the Muslims. I looked around on the train and I saw a bunch of these papers being read. It's funny, Obama was just saying that he was on our side a couple weeks 
ago because he fears Iran. Jews who don't already know need to start realizing he is not good for us.
Ok, I just looked over two articles about his speech. It seems as though he was very vague. Although, it did say he calls for us to give up some of our land to the Palestinians. What do they call that? A two state solution? Uh, huh... we'll see, solution...Hey, maybe the US should give Alaska to the Palestinians! No, they won't like the weather... Hawaii... let's give Hawaii to the Arabs.... I'm trying to make point....
ago because he fears Iran. Jews who don't already know need to start realizing he is not good for us. Ok, I just looked over two articles about his speech. It seems as though he was very vague. Although, it did say he calls for us to give up some of our land to the Palestinians. What do they call that? A two state solution? Uh, huh... we'll see, solution...
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
There was a lot of Obama stuff in the paper this weekend
So, I read the paper over Shabbos. I have yet failed to blog about it.
They were discussing Obama. In one article (Face to Face), the author seemed to think that Obama was on Israel's side because the issue of whether or not Iran will build nuclear weapons. I guess the idea is that if everyone is against Iran together it's better. I suppose that's better than nothing. However, it seems like this is not an ideal situation either, as it doesn't seem like such a stable allyship.
In the other article (Making It Harder To Buy A New Car) that discussed Obama, they were talking about the domestic automobile dealerships. It seems Obama is behind some restructuring that's going on in the auto dealership world. These domestic dealers each closed down a percentage of their dealerships. The funny thing is that the main branch doesn't gain or lose anything with an auto dealership. They are franchises. This will hurt the American auto industry and push more business to the foreign auto dealers. Therefore this will further hurt the economy. They explained in the article that Obama's people pressured the auto companies to do this. Ford didn't receive was GM and Crysler received, so they are not part of this.
Then I opened up the goyishe free paper (Metro, P. 4) and Obama was being criticized there because he wants terrorism suspects in the prison on the US mainland instead of in a prison at the US naval base on Guantanamo bay, Cuba.
On the same page in the goyishe Metro, there was an article about the restructuring at GM. The focus in the Metro's mini
article is not on the effect on the dealerships but the fact that they will cut labor costs. I think this means they want to cut labor. I see here they're offering retiree health care insentive... the crown jewel of a bad economy and union job elimations through early retirements. Well, ain't that as American as apple pie?
The flag is from flickr Uploaded on August 11, 2007 by ladybugbkt
http://www.flickr.com/photos/branditressler/1079313492/?addedcomment=1#comment72157618843479384
The Apple pie is from flickr: Uploaded on November 22, 2007 by hoveringdog
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bcveen/2053950521/in/dateposted/
They were discussing Obama. In one article (Face to Face), the author seemed to think that Obama was on Israel's side because the issue of whether or not Iran will build nuclear weapons. I guess the idea is that if everyone is against Iran together it's better. I suppose that's better than nothing. However, it seems like this is not an ideal situation either, as it doesn't seem like such a stable allyship.
In the other article (Making It Harder To Buy A New Car) that discussed Obama, they were talking about the domestic automobile dealerships. It seems Obama is behind some restructuring that's going on in the auto dealership world. These domestic dealers each closed down a percentage of their dealerships. The funny thing is that the main branch doesn't gain or lose anything with an auto dealership. They are franchises. This will hurt the American auto industry and push more business to the foreign auto dealers. Therefore this will further hurt the economy. They explained in the article that Obama's people pressured the auto companies to do this. Ford didn't receive was GM and Crysler received, so they are not part of this. Then I opened up the goyishe free paper (Metro, P. 4) and Obama was being criticized there because he wants terrorism suspects in the prison on the US mainland instead of in a prison at the US naval base on Guantanamo bay, Cuba.
On the same page in the goyishe Metro, there was an article about the restructuring at GM. The focus in the Metro's mini
article is not on the effect on the dealerships but the fact that they will cut labor costs. I think this means they want to cut labor. I see here they're offering retiree health care insentive... the crown jewel of a bad economy and union job elimations through early retirements. Well, ain't that as American as apple pie?The flag is from flickr Uploaded on August 11, 2007 by ladybugbkt
http://www.flickr.com/photos/branditressler/1079313492/?addedcomment=1#comment72157618843479384
The Apple pie is from flickr: Uploaded on November 22, 2007 by hoveringdog
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bcveen/2053950521/in/dateposted/
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
Oh, Bomb us, is helping his people that he claims are not his people
http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2009--02-04-E9-2488
I'm disgusted with all this pity on the "Palestinians." Now our government is giving them assistance and considering them victims. Have our senators gone mad? Shouldn't they know better after NINE-ELEVEN? Shouldn't they realize that the Arabs are not our friends. Look at their track record. I guess the rest of the world just misses the fact that they were relentlessly sending Qassams, which are rockets, into Israel.
It seems to have been forgotten that Israel owns the land, not the persons from Gaza. The land was owned by Britain and they allowed Israel to be settled by the Jewish people. At some point, Israel sectioned that part of their country off for the people who had previously had the nation. However, this is not good enough.
Hat tip to someone named Zev Isaacs to sending this to the Yated "Readers write" section (p.126)
I'm disgusted with all this pity on the "Palestinians." Now our government is giving them assistance and considering them victims. Have our senators gone mad? Shouldn't they know better after NINE-ELEVEN? Shouldn't they realize that the Arabs are not our friends. Look at their track record. I guess the rest of the world just misses the fact that they were relentlessly sending Qassams, which are rockets, into Israel.
It seems to have been forgotten that Israel owns the land, not the persons from Gaza. The land was owned by Britain and they allowed Israel to be settled by the Jewish people. At some point, Israel sectioned that part of their country off for the people who had previously had the nation. However, this is not good enough.
Hat tip to someone named Zev Isaacs to sending this to the Yated "Readers write" section (p.126)
Monday, February 23, 2009
The Obama-nation Is An Abomination!!!
Michal's reaction to this article:
Obama pledges to slash deficit — after increase
By LIZ SIDOTI
From: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090224/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_economy
I hope this link doesn't go away. However, I will make my comments relevant in case the link expires out.
This is an article about how Obama is put his little pork barrel spending Stimulus bill into fruition and yet he still states he's going to cut the budget. Is he for real? He wants to confront the crisis without confronting how we got to it.
The fact that some many people voted for this man is sheer and utter proof that the nation is stupid and uneducated. Spending another $787 billion dollars is *NOT* the way to reduce a deficit. He states, "We cannot simply spend as we please and defer the consequences." Oh, yeah? It seems as though that is what you are doing with this stimulus bill. He wants to shun, "casual dishonesty of hiding irresponsible spending with clever accounting tricks." Meanwhile, this is exactly what the stimulus bill is. It's nothing more than a pile of casual dishonesty to hide... oops not spending, however, he's hiding what he's doling out to lobbyist and such.
They want to give the government the banks. It must because the US government is sooooo good with it's money. Oh, and Abomination claims he's going to fix the impending social security and healthcare issues. Oooo! Can I have lemon Merengue? You know, for my pie in the sky....
The writer of the article (Liz Sidoti) states, "With his re-election race just a few years away, he also has an interest in avoiding being labeled as a big-government, big-spending Democrat." If he's trying for that label, he's off to a good start.
Obama pledges to slash deficit — after increase
By LIZ SIDOTI
From: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090224/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_economy
I hope this link doesn't go away. However, I will make my comments relevant in case the link expires out.
This is an article about how Obama is put his little pork barrel spending Stimulus bill into fruition and yet he still states he's going to cut the budget. Is he for real? He wants to confront the crisis without confronting how we got to it.
The fact that some many people voted for this man is sheer and utter proof that the nation is stupid and uneducated. Spending another $787 billion dollars is *NOT* the way to reduce a deficit. He states, "We cannot simply spend as we please and defer the consequences." Oh, yeah? It seems as though that is what you are doing with this stimulus bill. He wants to shun, "casual dishonesty of hiding irresponsible spending with clever accounting tricks." Meanwhile, this is exactly what the stimulus bill is. It's nothing more than a pile of casual dishonesty to hide... oops not spending, however, he's hiding what he's doling out to lobbyist and such.
They want to give the government the banks. It must because the US government is sooooo good with it's money
The writer of the article (Liz Sidoti) states, "With his re-election race just a few years away, he also has an interest in avoiding being labeled as a big-government, big-spending Democrat." If he's trying for that label, he's off to a good start.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)